A Civil Religious Debate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
- Find a debate you care about.
- Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
- Earn points and become a thought leader!
To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.
Be Yourself
Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Dermot
| Reward Points: | 5736 |
| Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 87% |
| Arguments: | 8111 |
| Debates: | 95 |
Joined:
Nietzsche had a lot to say for himself and a lot of his “ philosophical “ arguments are little more than him airing his personal grievances against Christianity ; all of what you say might hold sway with individuals who claim to be armchair philosophers for me Nietzsche was interesting to a point but he was also barking mad and spent a good part of his life in an asylum for the insane
If God does exist he is incredibly non interventionist ,I find it quiet baffling that a belief in something you can't see ,touch ,or hear is even labelled as God ...hope fully some time in the future if you make such claims men dressed in white coats will come and take such individuals away for treatment
About Me
"Antique and fine arts collector , lecturer in fine arts , art works represented in three galleries"
|
||||||||||||||
Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here
