A Civil Religious Debate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
- Find a debate you care about.
- Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
- Earn points and become a thought leader!
To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.
Be Yourself
Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Anate
| Reward Points: | 16 |
| Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 94% |
| Arguments: | 15 |
| Debates: | 0 |
Joined:
Ryan Stenger’s modal atheism argument pretty much proves atheism.
A. It is possible that p.
B. Necessarily, if it is possible that God exists, then it is necessary that God exists.
C. Necessarily, if God exists, then it is not the case that p.
D. Therefore, it is not possible that God exists. (from A, B, & C)
Various plugins for P can be used. Like,
1. Evil exists and a God is incompatible with it.
2. Minds can only exist in the physical world.
3. Free non god beings always do what is morally wrong.
4. Omnipotence is impossible
5. Being morally perfect is impossible
6. Omniscience is impossible
7. The universe was created by a non god thing.
It seems counter intuitive, but it works because god is said to be a necessity.
About Me
|
||||||||||||
Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here
