A Civil Religious Debate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
- Find a debate you care about.
- Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
- Earn points and become a thought leader!
To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.
Be Yourself
Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Ryuukyuzo
| Reward Points: | 641 |
| Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 90% |
| Arguments: | 896 |
| Debates: | 10 |
Joined:
Only if 'immature' = 'most popular'. Most atheists I find argue against 'Yahweh' because that's the most commonly held idea of "God", not because he's a soft target. There are much softer targets available.
Now, some theists pull this ad-hoc loopty-loop bullshit where "God" is equal to whatever God has to be in order to dodge your criticisms of it. In this case, they're banking on the idea that if you make something sound complicated and ethereal enough, you can use the confusion your ideas cause as evidence that they are 'deep' and 'mature'. Debating these kinds of people, while tempting, is ultimately pointless.
Their whole method is to hide the contradictions in their ideology. You will never be able to peg them on anything substantial in their philosophy because they would never consciously risk being proven wrong and will instead remain permanently aloof.
In short, no. Atheists are not arguing against an immature notion of God. They argue against what's presented to them. Not presenting anything concrete =/= presenting something 'mature'.
About Me
|
||||||||||||||
Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here
