A Civil Religious Debate

I have to say that Buddhism is not really a religion, it's a philosophy. Atheists do reject the existence of gods, spirits, ghosts - anything related to supernatural power. Buddhists do not reject anything. It is told to be that when Buddha's followers asked him if God exists,he said nothing. It means he didn't say that God exists, but he didn't reject his existence. They also believe that every human can become enlighted as Buddha, so he becomes a God of his own world.

Isn't atheism just a view when you do not believe in any God, whether it is Buddha or not?Buddhists believe in supernatural beings, as you say, they believe in energy in human's body. They concentrate on themselfes, and I khow there are some Buddhists who do not even talk about God. They just have another view on it. They believe in Buddha. But it's not about atheism, when you totally do not believe in anything,except that God doesn't exist. Anyway, I would not call it a religion of atheists,because in the end they all find the God through meditations and this kind of stuff.

I do agree that there is no such thing as an atheistic religion,because religion is when you have some cultural beliefs, you have your own world-view, you give a meaning to life,to every single action. You also give a meaning to the origin of life and you believe in the existence of God, you believe that the universe was not created by itself. But atheism is the opposite of religion. Of course, atheists have their own world-view, but it's totally different. It's not about God, not about believing in this power. Atheists do not believe at all. So in my opinion, it shouldn't be called a religion. I was shocked to know that atheists go to the church for non-believers and talk about that God is a fake. It's not a religion, it's just a propaganda of atheism. And it's really becoming popular.