A Civil Religious Debate is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
- Find a debate you care about.
- Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
- Earn points and become a thought leader!
To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.
Be Yourself
Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Winovertruth
| Reward Points: | 9 |
| Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 95% |
| Arguments: | 9 |
| Debates: | 0 |
Joined:
you take the scientific community as a source of truth. This is an appeal to authority, who are abstract and undefined. It lends discrete if one believes them relevant to the truth of the proposed statement, but i do not believe that this abstract entity has any relevance to this argument. To be more clear, this scientific community has about as much possibility as god.
this does nothing to disprove the existence of a god. an explanation for why such a concept may have been created does not disprove the god.
of course he does, he is non-existing, therefore asking whether or not he exists is pointless. You cannot ask if an incorporeal thing exists, since by its definition, it does not.
About Me
|
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |
Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here
