Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 463 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 92% |
Arguments: | 591 |
Debates: | 7 |
Biogenesis was accepted as fact. Life comes from life, it does not come from rocks an water. Why don't you explain to me how 100,000,000,000,000 atoms arranged themselves to form the first cell at random. Complete with a functional DNA and happening to be in an environment where it can survive.
The entire scientific community has a vested interest in showing where life came from, but you can't.
Amino Acids can not randomly combine to create protein molecule, more or less a living cell. No known natural process can explain the generation of the first living things on earth. The natural creation of even the molecules to create life violates the laws of thermodynamics. All natural processes convert chemicals from high organization to high chaos, simpler molecules. That is the reason why, after millions of years of death on earth. It would take large amounts of directed focused energy to create the first living cells on the planet. Without organization, the creation of a single protein has the same odds as a tornado going through a scrapyard and assembling a working Boeing 747.
See the Law of Biogenesis. Scientific laws essentially prove the existence of a higher power.
|