This, it must include relevance to the supernatural to distinguish it from other ideologies, and most include relevance to well being to distinguish it from Deism.

You think the Thomistic argument from contingency is "preposterous"?

I wouldn't like to say until we clarify "immature notions". What would you mean by that?

Got a reason why?

Because I don't think any concept of God is correct, any concept that invokes the supernatural cannot be empirically proven, and thus doesn't interest me. Unless the true concept of God is natural, which defeats the point of being God, all the different concepts can be disregarded simultaneously.

I see you took some inspiration from me here ;)

While it's not a position I take, it's certainly one that, if more famous, would have a large amount of followers. There are thousands of gods in history, and an infinite number of combinations. So when we say "God", how do we know we are correct in our usage?